Sony speaks
Fairly dull, but here’s Sony’s initial disclosures (original) in White Wolf v. Sony. If you didn’t already know the basic argument Sony will be using, here it is: To the extent any similarities exist between Plaintiffs’ works and Defendants’ Underworld movie, any such similarities concern material that is not original, not protectable expression, lies within the public domain, and/or constitutes unprotectable ideas or scenes a faire. (I define scenes a faire here — “ideas that are inherent to the conventional telling of a given sort of story.”) ...